Table of Contents >
Part J. Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives
Chapter 36. Introduction to Evaluation >
Section 4. Choosing Evaluators >
Tools & Checklists - A checklist that summarizes the major points contained in the section. >
Choosing Evaluators | |
|---|---|
Tools & Checklists |
Contributed by Phil Rabinowitz Edited by Bill Berkowitz and Tim Brownlee |
Checklist
Here, you'll find a checklist summarizing the major points contained in the text.
Why Evaluate
___to see results of work
___to gain public opinion
___to make the proper adjustments if necessary
Select Evaluators Carefully
___for reliablity
Possible Evaluators
___volunteers
___community being serviced
___chosen evaluators by a team
Evaluation Consultant Selection Interview Questions
From EvalTalk, the discussion group of the American Evaluation Association (AEA). See the website: http://www.eval.org/.
Here is one list of evaluation consultant selection questions adapted from EvalTalk postings:
1. What are the main reasons why you think a program should conduct an evaluation?
2. What are the main standards and guiding principles for conducting evaluations?
3. How would you determine if a program is ready to undergo an evaluation?
4. How do you estimate the resources needed to conduct an evaluation? That is, how do you compute the costs of an evaluation, both in money and time (yourself and others)?
5. If you had results from an evaluation that were based on quantitative information that conflicted with results from qualitative information, how would you resolve the conflict?
6. If you were to conduct a mailed-out survey to program participants, how would you achieve a representative sample and ensure that your results were generalizable to all participants?
7. Frequently evaluations involve various and independent branches and agencies that all have different expectations for the evaluation. If you had a conflict among participants in a program evaluation that could threaten the evaluation, how would you resolve the conflict? What steps would you take to proactively avoid conflict?
8. Read any interesting articles on evaluation lately? In what journals? What was interesting about it? What other journals do you see regularly?
9. Under what circumstances, if any, would you blow the whistle on a client?
10. What would you do to ensure that an evaluation is useful -- and useful in what ways?
Work Group for Community Health and Development
at the University of Kansas.Copyright © 2007 by the University of Kansas for all materials provided via the World Wide Web in the ctb.ku.edu domain.
