-
What are teams and team building?
-
What are the advantages and disadvantages of teams?
-
When should you build teams?
-
What makes a good team?
-
How do you build a team?
In sports, talented players do not automatically create an effective team. People also have to understand their roles, coordinate with one another, communicate, adapt, and work toward a shared outcome.
Community work is different from competitive sports in important ways, but the same basic lesson applies: many important tasks depend on several people's knowledge and work fitting together.
Teams can bring together expertise, community knowledge, relationships, practical skills, and perspectives that no one person possesses. They can also create coordination costs, unclear responsibility, conflict, or unnecessary meetings when a team is used for work that one person could accomplish more effectively.
One important task of leadership is therefore not simply putting people into teams, but deciding when teamwork is actually useful and creating the conditions in which people can work together effectively.
What are teams and team building?
What is a team?
A team is an interdependent group of people who coordinate their work toward a shared purpose, outcome, or responsibility.
Many groups share a general goal without functioning as a team. People attending the same coalition meeting, working for the same organization, or supporting the same cause may still perform largely independent work.
Teamwork becomes especially important when:
- One person's work depends on another person's work
- Several kinds of expertise are needed
- Information must move among people for decisions to be accurate
- Work has to be coordinated across roles
- People share responsibility for an outcome
Effective teams generally understand:
- What they are trying to accomplish
- Why the work matters
- What each member is responsible for
- How members' responsibilities depend on one another
- How information and decisions will be shared
- How progress and quality will be assessed
A team does not have to behave like a single person. Members may have different responsibilities, professional obligations, communication styles, schedules, perspectives, and areas of expertise. Healthy teamwork allows those differences to contribute to the work rather than requiring everyone to think or behave alike.
Team success also does not require people to give up appropriate individual recognition. Some accomplishments belong to the group; others depend heavily on the work or expertise of particular members. Good teams recognize both.
What is team building?
Team building is the process of designing and developing the conditions that help people coordinate effectively toward a shared purpose.
That may mean assembling a new team for a particular task or helping an existing group improve how it works.
Team building can involve:
- Defining the team's purpose
- Identifying needed roles and capabilities
- Clarifying responsibilities and authority
- Establishing communication systems
- Developing teamwork skills
- Building trust through reliable work
- Creating ways to raise concerns and resolve conflict
- Making meetings and information accessible
- Reviewing performance and learning from experience
Team building is not synonymous with games, retreats, social events, or bonding exercises. Those activities may sometimes support relationships, but teams are built primarily through repeated experience working together with clear expectations, useful communication, appropriate support, and accountability.
What capabilities does a team need?
The exact combination depends on the work, but teams may need:
- Technical or functional expertise. Knowledge and skills necessary to perform the team's substantive work.
- Problem-solving and decision-making skills. The ability to define problems, examine information, evaluate alternatives, and learn from results.
- Communication and coordination skills. The ability to share relevant information, manage handoffs, communicate uncertainty, and keep dependent work aligned.
- Interpersonal and conflict-management skills. The ability to disagree constructively, give and receive feedback, and address problems without unnecessary personal conflict.
- Adaptability. The ability to respond when circumstances, evidence, or priorities change.
- Self-management. Reliability, appropriate boundaries, organization, and responsibility for agreed work.
Few individuals will excel in every area. The purpose of a team is partly to combine complementary capabilities.
Selecting or assigning people to teams
Where you have a choice about membership, begin with the work rather than with a preferred personality type.
Ask:
- What knowledge and skills are required?
- What community or lived knowledge is relevant?
- Which roles require particular authority or credentials?
- What capacity and availability will members need?
- What different perspectives will help the team understand the problem?
- Can members communicate and work respectfully with the people involved?
- Are important responsibilities unnecessarily concentrated in one person?
Avoid relying heavily on vague judgments about "personality fit," body language, social similarity, or whether a person seems like someone the existing team would naturally like.
People do not have to become friends to work effectively together. They do need to meet legitimate role expectations, communicate respectfully, and be willing to coordinate their work.
In employment settings, selection criteria should be connected with the role and administered consistently with applicable nondiscrimination requirements.
Developing an existing group into a team
Often you do not get to choose the members. An existing staff, coalition, Board, working group, or partnership may need to function more like a team.
In that situation, don't begin by deciding which members have the wrong personalities. Look first at the conditions under which people are being asked to work.
Problems may come from:
- Unclear goals
- Conflicting responsibilities
- Poor information flow
- Unresolved disagreements
- Unequal workload
- Lack of authority
- Missing skills or resources
- Historical mistrust
- Inconsistent supervision
- Competition among programs or organizations
Some team problems are interpersonal, but many are structural. Team-building activities will have limited effect if the actual problem is that two people have been given incompatible responsibilities, no one knows who decides, or the team lacks the resources to accomplish what it has been assigned.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of teams?
Teams can be powerful, but they are not automatically the best way to organize every task.
Potential advantages
- Teams can combine different kinds of expertise. Complex work may require knowledge that no individual possesses.
- Teams can bring more information and perspectives into decisions. This advantage depends on members being able to share and examine what they know rather than simply having diverse information present in the room.
- Teams can coordinate interdependent work. Clear coordination can prevent duplicated effort, gaps, and conflicting actions.
- Team members can learn from one another. Observation, cross-training, feedback, and collaborative problem solving can expand people's capabilities.
- Teams can create backup and resilience. Cross-training and shared knowledge may make the work less dependent on one person.
- Teams can support leadership development. Members can lead projects, meetings, analyses, or particular areas of work according to expertise and responsibility.
- Teams can strengthen implementation. People who help understand a problem and develop a solution may be better prepared to implement it.
Potential disadvantages
- Coordination requires time. Meetings, communication, handoffs, and joint decision-making create overhead.
- Responsibility can become unclear. "The team" should not become a substitute for identifying who actually owns a decision or task.
- Groups can overlook information. Members may withhold concerns, defer too quickly to authority, or assume someone else has already raised an issue.
- Conflict can interfere with the work. Unresolved disagreements about goals, roles, workload, quality, or behavior can consume substantial time.
- Teams can develop groupthink or excessive conformity. Strong cohesion is not always beneficial if members become unwilling to question the group's assumptions.
- Participation can become unequal. Some voices may dominate while others' expertise is ignored.
- Uneven workload can create resentment or burnout.
- Teams can continue after they are no longer needed. Periodically ask whether the work still requires a team.
Team versus working group
Not every group needs to become a highly interdependent team.
A working group may be appropriate when people mainly perform independent tasks, exchange information occasionally, or coordinate only at specific points.
A more integrated team is useful when members depend substantially on one another to produce the result.
The goal is not to turn every committee, department, coalition, or staff group into one tightly bonded unit. It is to use enough coordination and shared responsibility for the work that actually needs to be done.
When should you build teams?
Teams are particularly useful when the work is interdependent, complex, or requires several kinds of expertise.
Consider a team when:
- Several roles must coordinate closely
- The problem crosses professional, organizational, or community boundaries
- Different types of knowledge are necessary
- Implementation requires several people to act consistently
- No single person has enough information or capacity
- Ongoing adaptation requires information from several sources
- Shared ownership is important to the work
A team may be unnecessary when:
- One person can perform the task effectively and independently
- Coordination costs would exceed the value of collaboration
- The work is routine and does not require ongoing joint decisions
- An immediate decision must be made by the person with clear responsibility
Even when one person performs the core task, others may still provide review, implementation, technical expertise, or oversight. The question is how much interdependence the work actually requires.
Examples of useful team applications
- Developing a strategic plan when several groups hold relevant knowledge or responsibility
- Starting a new organization or initiative
- Planning or implementing a new program or intervention
- Building or operating a coalition
- Planning and carrying out a community assessment
- Evaluating an organization, initiative, or intervention when several forms of expertise or stakeholder knowledge are needed
- Planning and conducting advocacy
- Running a fundraising campaign or community event
- Coordinating a complex program or organizational function
- Delivering interprofessional health, education, human-service, or community support
- Managing long-term community development or organizing efforts
What makes a good team?
Effective teams vary considerably. A temporary event-planning team, an emergency-response team, a health-care team, and a community coalition should not be expected to operate in exactly the same way.
Several conditions, however, are useful across many types of teams.
A clear and meaningful purpose
Members need to understand what the team exists to accomplish and how its work connects with the larger organization or community.
Purpose does not require every member to feel the same degree of emotional passion. People can contribute excellent work because they understand their responsibilities and believe the work is worthwhile.
Appropriate composition
The team should collectively possess the knowledge, skills, authority, capacity, and community understanding required by the work.
More individually accomplished members do not automatically create a better team. The important question is whether the team's capabilities match its responsibilities.
Complementary perspectives
Different professional backgrounds, lived experiences, organizational roles, and viewpoints can help a team identify possibilities and risks that a more homogeneous group might miss.
Diversity by itself does not guarantee better decisions. The team also needs conditions that allow people to contribute their different information and have it considered seriously.
Role clarity
Members should know:
- What they own
- What others own
- Where responsibilities overlap
- Which work depends on them
- What they depend on from others
- Who makes which decisions
Clear roles reduce duplication and gaps while still allowing people to help one another when circumstances change.
Useful information sharing
Team members need access to the information required for their responsibilities.
Establish how the team will:
- Share updates
- Document decisions
- Escalate urgent issues
- Manage handoffs
- Store shared information
- Protect confidential information
Do not assume that copying every team member on every message creates good communication. Effective information sharing means the right information reaches the people who need it in a usable form and at the right time.
A shared understanding of the work
Members should have compatible understandings of the team's objectives, roles, major processes, and how their work fits together.
This does not require identical opinions. It means that members understand enough of the same operating picture to coordinate effectively.
Psychological safety
Team members should be able to raise work-related concerns without unnecessary fear of embarrassment, retaliation, or personal punishment.
They should be able to:
- Ask questions
- Admit uncertainty
- Ask for help
- Report mistakes
- Identify safety or quality problems
- Disagree with a more senior person
- Suggest another approach
Psychological safety does not mean that performance standards disappear or that any behavior is acceptable. Accountability and candor should reinforce one another.
Constructive conflict
Good teams do not eliminate disagreement.
They distinguish disagreement about the work from personal attacks and establish ways to examine competing ideas.
Members should know what happens when they cannot reach agreement and who has authority to decide or escalate the issue.
Clear decision processes
Not every decision needs full team consensus.
Depending on the situation, a team may use:
- An accountable leader deciding after consultation
- A delegated subject-matter expert
- Majority or supermajority vote
- Consent
- Consensus
Identify the decision rule before major disagreement occurs.
Leadership appropriate to the work
Some teams have one formal leader. Others distribute leadership among members.
Leadership functions may include:
- Setting or clarifying direction
- Coordinating work
- Facilitating discussion
- Making particular decisions
- Maintaining relationships with other groups
- Providing specialized expertise
- Monitoring quality or safety
Those responsibilities do not necessarily have to belong to the same person.
Mutual accountability
Team members need clear expectations for quality, deadlines, communication, and follow-through.
Accountability should focus on responsibilities and results rather than shame or labels about who is the team's "weak link."
Realistic workload and adequate resources
Team cohesion cannot compensate indefinitely for inadequate staffing, insufficient time, outdated technology, inaccessible systems, or unrealistic workloads.
Teams need the tools, information, training, authority, staffing, and time required to do what they have been assigned.
Learning and adaptation
Effective teams periodically examine what is happening and change when necessary.
They ask:
- What did we expect to happen?
- What actually happened?
- What helped?
- What got in the way?
- What should we do differently next time?
How do you build a team?
Building a team involves much more than selecting members. In many situations, you will be working with an existing group and will have little or no control over membership.
The following guidelines are not a rigid sequence. Different teams will need different emphasis depending on their purpose and history.
Define the work before defining the team
Clarify:
- What outcome the team is responsible for
- Why a team is needed
- What work is inside and outside its scope
- What authority it has
- How long the team is expected to exist
Avoid creating a team because teamwork sounds desirable when responsibilities could be handled more simply by one person or an existing organizational role.
Choose or assign members according to the work
Where membership can be selected, identify the capabilities and perspectives the work requires.
Consider:
- Technical expertise
- Practical experience
- Community and lived knowledge
- Decision-making authority
- Communication and coordination ability
- Capacity and availability
- Ability to work through disagreement
- Relevant professional or legal qualifications
A team benefits from people who can work respectfully together, but do not confuse respectful collaboration with having similar personalities or backgrounds.
Clarify the purpose
Members need a shared understanding of what the team is trying to accomplish.
Depending on the situation, the purpose may come from:
- The organization's mission or strategic plan
- A Board or governing body
- A grant or contract
- A community planning process
- Law or policy
- The team itself
Clarify which parts of the purpose are already established and which the team has authority to shape.
Define roles, dependencies, and authority
Each member should understand:
- Their responsibilities
- Relevant deadlines and standards
- What decisions they can make independently
- When they need consultation or approval
- Who depends on their work
- Which information they need from others
Cross-train where useful so important work does not stop whenever one person is absent.
Establish team norms
Teams benefit from explicit agreements about how they will work together.
Topics may include:
- Respectful communication
- Meeting preparation
- Response-time expectations
- Information sharing
- Confidentiality
- Decision processes
- Conflict resolution
- Giving and receiving feedback
- How concerns are escalated
- Accessibility
- Remote and hybrid participation
Norms should not override organizational policy, employment requirements, safeguarding responsibilities, professional duties, or legitimate complaint procedures.
Create psychological safety
Leaders and team members build psychological safety through repeated behavior.
Useful practices include:
- Asking for concerns before making important decisions
- Responding constructively when someone reports a mistake
- Admitting uncertainty
- Thanking people for raising risks
- Separating disagreement from disrespect
- Avoiding retaliation
- Making clear how serious concerns can be reported
Build relationships through the work
Trust grows when people see that colleagues are competent, honest, reliable, willing to help, and able to follow through.
Optional relationship-building activities may also be useful, but they should fit the team and should not require unnecessary physical activity, personal disclosure, alcohol, after-hours participation, or other conditions that create barriers.
A retreat, shared meal, informal conversation, or social activity may help some teams. Participation outside required work or volunteer duties should not become an unofficial test of commitment or belonging.
Establish communication systems
Decide where different kinds of communication belong.
For example:
- What needs a meeting?
- What can be handled asynchronously?
- Where are decisions recorded?
- Where are current documents stored?
- How are urgent matters communicated?
- Which information is confidential?
Remote and hybrid teams should also clarify:
- Time-zone expectations
- Working-hour boundaries
- Messaging and response expectations
- Camera expectations
- Meeting accessibility
- How decisions made in informal conversations will be documented for people who were not present
Address conflict early and appropriately
Teams do not need to eliminate all conflict.
Address problems such as:
- Unclear or overlapping responsibility
- Unequal workload
- Repeated missed commitments
- Poor communication
- Disrespectful behavior
- Strategic disagreement
- Competition over resources or authority
Some disagreements can be resolved directly among members or with facilitation. Harassment, discrimination, retaliation, threats, safeguarding concerns, or other serious misconduct may require a formal process rather than informal team mediation.
Make disagreement useful
Encourage members to challenge ideas without attacking people.
Ask members to explain:
- What evidence supports their view
- What risk they see
- What assumption they think may be wrong
- What alternative they recommend
Teams sometimes need a person whose role is to question assumptions, review risk, or bring in information from outside the group's usual perspective.
Start with meaningful work
Early work can help members learn how they coordinate and build confidence in one another.
Choose something appropriately scoped and genuinely useful rather than inventing a meaningless task simply to produce an easy win.
Provide the resources people need
Support may include:
- Training
- Appropriate staffing
- Clear supervision
- Technology
- Accessible materials and communication
- Flexible scheduling where possible
- Reliable information
- Appropriate workspace
- Backup coverage
- Time to do the work
Team enthusiasm cannot compensate indefinitely for missing resources or unreasonable workload.
Recognize both team and individual contributions
Celebrate collective accomplishments when the outcome genuinely depended on collective work.
Also recognize individual contributions when someone provided distinctive expertise, solved an important problem, carried additional responsibility, or produced work for which individual attribution matters.
Recognition should be specific and fair rather than based mainly on visibility, seniority, charisma, or closeness to the team leader.
Give useful feedback
Praise and corrective feedback both matter.
Useful feedback is:
- Timely
- Specific
- Connected to observable behavior or results
- Respectful
- Focused on improvement
Don't save needed corrective feedback until a problem becomes serious merely because criticism is uncomfortable.
Review the team's work regularly
After significant activities, consider an after-action review or retrospective.
Ask:
- What were we trying to accomplish?
- What happened?
- What worked?
- What did not?
- What information did we miss?
- Did our roles and communication work?
- What should we change next time?
The purpose is learning, not automatically finding someone to blame. Accountability may still be necessary when standards were knowingly ignored or harmful conduct occurred.
Evaluate how the team itself is functioning
Periodically examine:
- Progress toward the team's objectives
- Quality of work
- Role clarity
- Information sharing
- Coordination
- Workload
- Psychological safety
- Conflict
- Accessibility and participation
- Stakeholder or community experience
- Whether members have the needed resources
Ask whether the current structure is still useful. Teams may need to add expertise, change roles, revise processes, or sometimes stop operating altogether.
Close temporary teams deliberately
A project team should not simply disappear after the final task.
Before closing:
- Confirm that agreed work is complete
- Transfer unfinished responsibilities
- Document important decisions and lessons
- Transfer files, records, credentials, or relationships appropriately
- Recognize contributions
- Identify any follow-up responsibilities
In Summary
A team is more than several people assigned to the same project. Teamwork becomes important when people are interdependent and need to coordinate their knowledge, decisions, responsibilities, and actions to accomplish a shared purpose.
Teams can combine expertise, perspectives, community knowledge, and capacity in ways that individuals cannot. They can also create coordination costs, conflict, unclear responsibility, unequal workload, conformity, and unnecessary meetings. Use a team when the work genuinely benefits from interdependence.
Strong teams generally have a clear purpose, complementary capabilities, role clarity, useful information sharing, appropriate decision processes, psychological safety, constructive conflict, adequate resources, accountability, and the ability to learn and adapt.
Team building is therefore not mainly about finding people with matching personalities or organizing bonding activities. It is the ongoing work of designing responsibilities, communication, authority, relationships, resources, and learning processes so that people's contributions can fit together effectively.
Good teams also preserve individual judgment. Members should be able to question assumptions, raise risks, admit mistakes, and disagree with one another without being treated as disloyal to the group.
Finally, team effectiveness should be evaluated rather than assumed. Review both what the team accomplishes and how it accomplishes it. Good team design improves the conditions for success, but no team structure can guarantee the outcome.