Community Tool Box Community Tool Box

Chapter 13., Section 5. Developing a Community Leadership Corps: A Model for Service-Learning — Main Section | Community Tool Box

Main Section
mloewenstein Tue, 12/11/2012 - 15:06
  • What is service-learning?

  • What is a community leadership corps?

  • Why develop a community leadership corps?

  • When is a good time to develop a community leadership corps?

  • Who should be involved in developing a community leadership corps?

  • How do you go about developing a community leadership corps?

What is service-learning?

Service-learning is an educational approach that connects meaningful community work with intentional learning. Participants apply knowledge and skills in real settings, contribute to work identified with community partners, reflect on what they experience, and connect that experience with academic, professional, civic, or leadership goals.

Service-learning can take many forms, but high-quality experiences generally include:

  • Meaningful service or community-engaged work
  • Clearly defined learning goals
  • Preparation and orientation
  • Collaboration with community partners
  • Appropriate participant voice in planning and carrying out the experience
  • Ongoing supervision and support
  • Structured reflection
  • Assessment of both learning and community benefit

Service-learning is more than sending students or young people somewhere to volunteer. The educational purpose and community purpose should be connected intentionally.

Participants may receive academic credit, wages, a stipend, another form of support, or participate as genuine volunteers depending on the program. Those arrangements should be determined before the work begins and should comply with applicable employment, education, and volunteer requirements.

For example, a school might partner with a community organization so students can help analyze neighborhood environmental data while learning research and civic-engagement skills. A college course might work with a local nonprofit to evaluate a program, develop communication materials, conduct community outreach, or support another project identified with the host organization.

What is a community leadership corps?

A community leadership corps is one model of service-learning in which students or other developing leaders spend a defined period working with community organizations or initiatives.

Programs may use other names, such as:

  • Community-engaged learning program
  • Community fellowship
  • Service-learning placement program
  • Youth leadership program
  • Community-based field experience

Participants may work during a summer, academic term, school year, or another defined period. Placements may be in person, virtual, or hybrid when the work and supervision make that appropriate.

The experience should provide participants with meaningful responsibilities while giving host organizations useful support. It should not treat participants as temporary replacement staff or give inexperienced participants responsibilities beyond their preparation and supervision.

The relationships created through a placement may continue beyond the formal program. Participants may remain involved as volunteers, employees, community members, researchers, mentors, or partners, and host organizations may continue collaborating with the educational institution or coordinating organization.

Why develop a community leadership corps?

A well-designed program can benefit participants, host organizations, educational institutions, and communities.

It may:

  • Provide meaningful experience applying knowledge in real settings
  • Develop leadership, communication, teamwork, problem-solving, and professional skills
  • Strengthen civic knowledge and community engagement
  • Help participants understand community strengths, challenges, institutions, and systems
  • Create pathways into community-based careers or future volunteer leadership
  • Strengthen partnerships among schools, colleges, community organizations, public agencies, and other institutions
  • Bring useful participant energy, skills, and perspectives to community projects
  • Help organizations complete appropriately scoped projects
  • Give community organizations opportunities to help educate future practitioners and leaders
  • Connect academic or professional learning with community knowledge and experience

These benefits are not automatic. A placement that provides little supervision, assigns meaningless work, displaces paid staff, exposes participants to avoidable risk, or creates more work for the host than value can fail both as education and as community service.

When is a good time to develop a community leadership corps?

Develop a program when you have enough organizational and community capacity to provide worthwhile placements.

Useful conditions include:

  • Clear learning and community-engagement goals
  • Strong potential host partnerships
  • Staff time for program coordination
  • Resources for training and supervision
  • A plan for participant safety and support
  • Appropriate compensation or volunteer arrangements
  • Accessible participation
  • A system for reflection and evaluation

An existing strategic plan can help identify community priorities and partner organizations, but a program does not need to wait for a particular stage of organizational development if the necessary partnerships and support are already in place.

Who should be involved in developing a community leadership corps?

Strong partnerships are central to the program.

Depending on the model, planning may involve:

  • Schools, colleges, universities, or training programs
  • Community-based and nonprofit organizations
  • Public agencies
  • Youth-serving organizations
  • Community members
  • Students and prospective participants
  • Workforce-development programs
  • Foundations or funders
  • Businesses or other organizations when an appropriate educational and legal arrangement exists

Participants themselves should have a meaningful voice in program design. They can help identify what preparation they need, what community issues matter to them, what barriers might prevent participation, and what kinds of experiences would support their learning.

Community partners should also help define what useful service looks like. A placement should respond to real organizational or community priorities rather than assuming that any student project will automatically be helpful.

How do you go about developing a community leadership corps?

Secure appropriate resources and organizational support

Even a small program requires time and coordination.

Possible resource needs include:

  • Program coordination
  • Participant compensation or stipends where applicable
  • Training
  • Host supervision
  • Transportation
  • Technology
  • Accessibility services
  • Background or other screening where required
  • Insurance or risk-management support
  • Materials
  • Evaluation

Funding may come from educational institutions, host organizations, foundations, public agencies, grants, donors, community organizations, or other sources.

Don't design an unpaid program simply because funding is limited. Determine first whether the proposed arrangement legally and ethically supports unpaid service or whether participants should be treated as employees or paid interns.

Clarify participant status and compensation

Before recruiting participants, determine what kind of arrangement you are offering.

Participants may be:

  • Students receiving academic credit
  • Paid employees
  • Paid interns or fellows
  • Stipended participants
  • Volunteers serving nonprofit, civic, religious, or community purposes where applicable

The title alone does not determine the legal arrangement. Consider the actual work, host organization, educational connection, compensation, participant expectations, supervision, and applicable federal and state requirements.

For minors, determine what work and schedule are legally permitted for their age and whether state law imposes additional requirements.

Identify and prepare host organizations

Hosts should be selected because they can provide meaningful learning and responsible supervision, not simply because they need additional labor.

Assess whether a potential host can provide:

  • Appropriate projects and responsibilities
  • A designated supervisor
  • Necessary training
  • Safe working conditions
  • Accessible participation
  • Appropriate technology and equipment
  • Clear confidentiality and data-handling practices
  • Emergency procedures
  • A respectful environment
  • Time for feedback and reflection

If minors participate, also determine whether the host has appropriate youth-safety policies, supervision, transportation procedures, screening practices where required, and procedures for responding to concerns.

Explain the educational purpose of the program. Hosts should understand that their responsibility is not simply to assign work but also to help participants understand why the work matters and what they are learning.

Identify meaningful host needs and projects

Work with each host to identify projects that are useful to the organization and appropriate for participants.

Ask:

  • What real organizational or community need would the participant address?
  • What would the participant learn?
  • Is the scope realistic for the placement period?
  • What knowledge or training is required?
  • Who will supervise the work?
  • What decisions may the participant make?
  • What information or systems will they access?
  • Are there safety, privacy, accessibility, or legal concerns?

Avoid two extremes. Participants should not spend most of the placement doing repetitive tasks with little educational value, but they also should not be given complex responsibilities for which they have not been prepared.

Participants can perform routine work as part of learning how an organization functions, but the overall experience should include substantive opportunities to learn and contribute.

Recruit participants broadly

Use recruitment methods that reach more than the students who already have the strongest academic records, professional networks, or extracurricular résumés.

Possible recruitment channels include:

  • School and college websites
  • Academic and career advising
  • Community organizations
  • Youth programs
  • Workforce-development programs
  • Student organizations
  • Community and professional networks
  • Email and social media
  • Direct outreach to people who may not already see themselves as likely applicants

Make program information and the application process accessible.

Explain:

  • Who is eligible
  • What participants will do
  • The expected schedule
  • Compensation or academic credit
  • Transportation expectations
  • Accessibility and accommodation procedures
  • Selection criteria
  • Key dates

Use fair and relevant selection criteria

Not every successful participant will have the highest grades or the most extensive résumé.

Depending on the program, useful criteria might include:

  • Interest in community work
  • Reliability
  • Relevant experience or knowledge
  • Interest in learning
  • Ability to meet the placement schedule
  • Communication skills
  • Readiness for the responsibilities involved

Consider what participants could become capable of with reasonable training and support, not only what they have already had an opportunity to demonstrate.

At the same time, do not place someone into responsibilities for which they cannot yet be prepared safely. Developmental opportunity should be matched with appropriate supervision.

Request only the application information needed to make the selection. Different programs may use an application, résumé, short statement, interview, reference, transcript, or other materials, but every requirement should have a clear purpose.

Identify participant interests, goals, and support needs

Talk with participants about:

  • Issues they care about
  • Skills they want to develop
  • Career or educational goals
  • Communities or types of organizations they want to learn about
  • Previous experience
  • Schedule and transportation
  • Accessibility or other support needs

Don't use interviews to judge private values, personality, or willingness to defer to authority when those characteristics are not relevant to the placement.

Protect information collected during recruitment and placement. Educational institutions and hosts should determine what student information may appropriately be shared and how it will be protected.

Train participants

Preparation should reflect the work participants will actually perform.

General orientation may address:

  • Program purpose
  • Participant roles and responsibilities
  • Community engagement and leadership
  • Respectful communication
  • Working across differences
  • Community strengths and context
  • Professional boundaries
  • Confidentiality and privacy
  • Data and technology security
  • Harassment and discrimination policies
  • Accessibility
  • Conflict resolution
  • Safety and emergency procedures
  • How to report concerns
  • Reflection and learning expectations

Programs serving minors should include age-appropriate information about youth safety, transportation, contact with adults or clients, prohibited work, emergency procedures, and how to get help.

Host organizations should then provide role-specific onboarding before participants begin substantive work.

A participant creating a website, conducting interviews, working with confidential records, organizing a public event, supporting clients, or handling data will need different training.

Match participants with host organizations

A good placement should align several factors:

  • Participant learning goals and interests
  • Host needs
  • Participant skills and readiness
  • Quality of supervision available
  • Schedule
  • Transportation
  • Accessibility
  • Location
  • Technology needs
  • Safety and confidentiality requirements

Where practical, let the participant meet the potential supervisor and learn about the proposed work before accepting the placement.

Don't match participants primarily according to perceived personality or whether they seem naturally suited to the host organization's culture. Clear expectations and good supervision matter more than personality similarity.

Examples of appropriate projects might include helping analyze community survey data, developing accessible outreach materials, supporting a neighborhood event, conducting background research for a policy initiative, updating a resource directory, assisting with program evaluation, creating digital communications, or supporting a community-engagement project.

Projects should be designed around actual community and organizational needs and the participant's level of preparation.

Develop a written service-learning agreement

The participant, host, and coordinating program should understand the arrangement before work begins.

A written agreement may include:

  • Learning objectives
  • Project responsibilities and deliverables
  • Participant status and compensation or credit
  • Schedule and placement duration
  • Host supervision responsibilities
  • Coordinator responsibilities
  • Training requirements
  • Accessibility arrangements
  • Transportation responsibilities
  • Confidentiality and privacy
  • Data and system access
  • Safety requirements
  • Communication and check-in procedures
  • How concerns will be reported
  • How progress will be evaluated
  • Procedures for changing or ending the placement

Participants should have meaningful input into their own learning goals and responsibilities.

Monitor, support, and supervise participants

Experiential learning requires regular support.

The frequency and form of supervision should reflect:

  • Participant age and experience
  • Complexity of the work
  • Safety and confidentiality risks
  • Length of the placement
  • Educational requirements

Regular check-ins give participants an opportunity to:

  • Review progress
  • Ask questions
  • Receive feedback
  • Discuss challenges
  • Connect experience with learning goals
  • Raise concerns about supervision, workload, safety, or treatment

Participants should also know how to reach someone between scheduled meetings if an urgent concern arises.

Program coordinators should communicate regularly with host supervisors as well. The purpose is not simply to ask whether the host is satisfied with the participant. Ask whether the project remains appropriate, whether supervision is adequate, what the participant is learning, and whether either side needs changes or additional support.

Site visits or virtual check-ins can help coordinators understand the actual placement environment and identify problems that may not be obvious through written reports.

Create safe ways to report concerns

Participants should not have to rely only on their immediate host supervisor when a problem involves that supervisor or organization.

Establish a way to report:

  • Harassment or discrimination
  • Unsafe work
  • Inappropriate supervision
  • Confidentiality or privacy concerns
  • Requests to perform prohibited or inappropriate work
  • Excessive or substantially different responsibilities
  • Other serious problems

Explain what will happen after a report is made and what confidentiality can and cannot be provided.

Support reflection throughout the experience

Reflection turns experience into learning.

It can occur during and after the placement through:

  • Individual reflection
  • Group discussion
  • Journals
  • Portfolios
  • Presentations
  • Project logs
  • Case discussions
  • Structured supervision

Reflection should go beyond asking whether participants enjoyed the experience or what they would do differently next time.

Questions might include:

  • What did I learn?
  • What assumptions changed?
  • What did community partners teach me?
  • What strengths did I observe in the community?
  • What systems or policies shaped the issue?
  • How did power or professional roles affect the work?
  • What ethical questions arose?
  • What effect did our work actually have?
  • What would I need to learn before taking on greater responsibility?

If journals or other reflections are submitted to supervisors or educators, tell participants clearly who will read them and what privacy they should expect.

Use approved communication and collaboration systems for participant support rather than assuming personal email or informal social-media channels are appropriate for sensitive placement information.

Evaluate progress during the placement

Don't wait until the experience ends to discover that the placement is not working.

Review:

  • Learning objectives
  • Project progress
  • Quality of supervision
  • Workload
  • Participant well-being
  • Accessibility
  • Transportation
  • Host needs
  • Safety
  • Whether responsibilities remain appropriate

Revise the agreement when the scope or learning goals change substantially.

Evaluate community benefit as well as student learning

A service-learning program should not judge success only by what participants learned.

Ask hosts and community partners:

  • Was the participant's work useful?
  • Did the project address a genuine organizational or community priority?
  • Was the supervision burden reasonable?
  • Did the participant have enough preparation?
  • Were community members treated respectfully?
  • Were there unintended negative effects?
  • What should change before another placement?

Participants should also be asked whether the host provided a meaningful, safe, accessible, and educational experience.

Close the placement carefully

At the end of the placement:

  • Complete or hand off unfinished work
  • Transfer agreed files and materials
  • Return organizational property
  • Remove system and account access that is no longer needed
  • Protect or delete confidential information appropriately
  • Review learning goals and outcomes
  • Collect participant and host feedback
  • Clarify whether any continuing relationship is expected

Recognize contributions

Recognition can help participants and partners reflect on what was accomplished and acknowledge the time and effort involved.

Recognition might include:

  • A closing gathering
  • Certificates
  • Participant presentations
  • A public showcase
  • Letters of recognition
  • A digital project portfolio
  • An informal thank-you event

Choose an approach appropriate to the participants, budget, community, and accessibility needs. A formal banquet is not necessary for a meaningful closing.

When publicizing participant accomplishments, obtain appropriate permission before sharing names, photographs, personal stories, or placement information.

Evaluate and improve the program

After each cycle, review the overall program.

Consider:

  • Whether participants achieved the intended learning outcomes
  • Whether hosts received useful contributions
  • Whether community partners considered the work relevant and respectful
  • Whether participants received appropriate supervision
  • Whether selection procedures created unnecessary barriers
  • Whether placements were accessible
  • Whether transportation or financial costs limited participation
  • Whether compensation and participant status were handled appropriately
  • Whether safety, harassment, privacy, or other concerns arose
  • Whether any placement displaced work that should have been performed by paid staff
  • What changes should be made before the next group begins

In Summary

Service-learning connects community work with intentional education. A community leadership corps or similar placement program can help participants develop practical skills, civic knowledge, leadership capacity, professional judgment, and stronger understanding of community life while contributing useful work to host organizations.

Strong programs are reciprocal. They are designed not only around what students can learn but also around what community partners identify as useful and appropriate.

Effective programs require more than finding students and placing them with organizations. Coordinators need to establish suitable partnerships, determine participant status and compensation, recruit fairly, create meaningful projects, provide training, address accessibility and safety, protect information, support supervisors, monitor placements, provide ways to report concerns, and create structured opportunities for reflection.

Programs involving minors require additional attention to supervision, transportation, youth-employment restrictions, safeguarding, emergency procedures, and other applicable requirements.

Finally, evaluate both sides of the experience. Participants should gain meaningful learning and development, and host organizations and communities should receive work that is useful, respectful, and responsibly carried out. When both learning and community benefit are built into the design from the beginning, service-learning can become a strong way to develop future community leadership while contributing to current community work.

Contributor

Chris Hampton

Jerry Schultz

Resources

Online Resources

Community colleges and service learning. American Association of Community Colleges. (1995).

Encore Leadership Corps: Promising Practices from Year One by the University of Maine Center on Aging. 

Teen Leadership Corps, an example syllabus.

Print Resources

Crews, R. (1995). The University of Colorado at Boulder service-learning handbook. Boulder, CO: The University of Colorado--Boulder Student Employment and Service -Learning Center.

Whitaker, U. (1989). Assessing learning: Standards, principles and procedures. Philadelphia, PA: Council for Adult and Experiential Learning.

https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/leadership/leadership-ideas/service-learning/main
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
© 1994-2026 The University of Kansas. All Rights Reserved.