Table of Contents >
Part J. Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives
Chapter 38. Some Methods for Evaluating Comprehensive Communi... >
Section 8. Conducting Interviews with Key Participants to An... >
Examples - Real world situational examples. >
Conducting Interviews with Key Participants to Analyze Critical Events | |
|---|---|
Examples |
Contributed by Aimee Whitman Edited by Bill Berkowitz and Jerry Schultz |
Example #1: Sample Narrative
Critical Event: Action Planning
Here are some examples of responses from an interview in which the participant
discussed action planning with her group.
A. RATIONALE:
The action plan kept us on a time line. Things were no longer
pie in the sky. We put up time lines that gave us something to go against. The action
plans are very much a working document.
B. CONTEXT OR CONDITIONS:
The coalition had spent a year talking in generalities.
We were ready to get down to action. We were holding press conferences that made
a commitment to the public to do something. We took all the change objectives and
laid out our action plan by task forces. Each task force met to further develop the
action plan. Most of us were not used to being in a true collaboration. The diversity
of the group required that we figure out how people fit. If we didn't define roles,
we would lose people.
C. KEY ACTIONS AND ACTORS:
Judy Johnston, Paula Marmet, Steve Coen, Mary Clark,
Tom Ryan, Maggie Chamberlain, and David Banks were key leaders. They forced us to
decide what we were going to do. The monthly brainstorming was very helpful. The
survey of importance and feasibility was very critical. The survey gave all the task
force members and partners a chance to get involved.
D. BARRIERS AND RESISTANCE:
Since people had experienced other types of strategic
planning, some eyes rolled where we started. Some thought it would not produce anything
useful. Eventually people believed that this planning process would be different.
E. KEY RESOURCES:
The task forces still had control over what would be pursued.
Steve Coen was very helpful in providing technical support.
F. CONSEQUENCES (Coalition):
The strategic plan made the coalition members
feel that we were finally underway. It helped with public perception. We now had
substance. This is what we are and what we do. It brought the coalition together
on its priorities. For example, the emphasis on early nutrition made it easier for
people to see that children were a priority for the coalition. It also made it much
easier to talk with potential funders.
G. CONSEQUENCES (Community):
Strategic planning got programs in place. Without
it, we might not have begun to work on the childcare curriculum. The action plan
put programs out there that weren't there before. Action planning also helped us
to pull in new partners. As the plan grew, additional partners become obvious. Partners
could see how they could be involved with the coalition and the mission.
Work Group for Community Health and Development
at the University of Kansas.Copyright © 2007 by the University of Kansas for all materials provided via the World Wide Web in the ctb.ku.edu domain.
