Skip to main content
Open search
You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.
Escriba su búsqueda...
Close search
Español
Caret down
العربية
English
Français
فارسی
Donaciones
Toggle Main Menu
Menú Principal
Aprender una habilidad
cómo-a la información
Aprender una habilidad sub-navigation
Tabla de contenidos
Conjunto de Herramientas
Ayuda para tomar acción
orientación para su trabajo
Ayuda para tomar acción sub-navigation
Resolver un problema
Enlaces a la base de datos de mejores prácticas
Pregunte a un asesor
Conectarse
enlace con otros
Conectarse sub-navigation
Libro de visitas
Pregunte a un asesor
Donaciones
Nosotros
La caja de herramientas
Nosotros sub-navigation
Contáctenos
Quienes somos
Sobre la Caja de Herramientas
Servicios
apoyar impacto colectivo
Servicios sub-navigation
Caja de Control Comunitario Sistema de Evaluación
Capacitación del Currículo
Construcción de Capacidades y Evaluación Participativa
Estación de Trabajo
Ask an Advisor Answers
Question:
I have resources to interview 50 people in my community of 50,000. How can I make this survey statistically valid?
Answer:
Excellent question. And in response, a key point is that statistical validity is a continuum, rather than a yes-no matter. There are degrees of validity; you want to make your survey as valid as possible, within the resources you have available. A second key point is that your sample should most accurately represent the population or group you wish to generalize to. What group would that be in your case? In other words, if you would like to generalize your findings to the entire community, then your sample should be drawn from that entire community, here of 50,000 people. If, however, you want your sample to be representative of (and generalize to) a smaller unit, then your sample should be drawn from that smaller population. In your situation, if you are interviewing 50 people, a commonly accepted procedure is to draw a random sample of 50 from all the members in your population ? which could be your entire community, or possibly a smaller group. (A random sample means that each member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample.) You would then need to obtain, or approximate, a list of all the members of your population. If your intended population is the full community, this could involve a town census list (if that is available), or a random selection of housing units. If your intended population is smaller, your task may be somewhat easier. Most good social science research methods textbooks will provide further details on survey mechanics. You may also wish to consult Chapter 3, Sections 12 and 13 of the Tool Box for some more general information on conducting interviews and surveys. If, though, a truly random sample is for some reason not possible, then you should normally make your best possible approximation to it, while being aware that this will usually diminish the statistical validity or representativeness of your findings. One more suggestion is to review your starting assumption that you have resources to interview only 50 people. Can this number be expanded? You might expand it either through obtaining additional resources, or through the use of volunteer trained interviewers, or using a smaller number of questions, or through group interviews, or an e-mailed or Web survey, or through staggering the survey dates, or through other efficiencies? On further consideration, it may be possible to include more than 50 people in your sample after all. We hope some of these thoughts may be helpful to you, and hope your survey proves to be very successful. Thank you for writing to us at the Community Tool Box; and all best wishes for success in your important work.
Question Date:
Thu, 03/29/2007