Skip to main content
Open search
جستجو
Close search
فارسی
Caret down
العربية
English
Español
Français
Toggle Main Menu
منوی اصلی
خودآموز باهمستان
راهنمای جامع برای توسعه و بهبود محلی
دورههای آموزشی
برای ارتقای حرفهای کنشگران محلی
تماس با ما
داستانتان را با ما درمیان بگذارید
تماس با ما sub-navigation
اشتراک خبرنامه
درباره ما
و جعبه ابزار باهمستان
Breadcrumb
خانه
Ask an Advisor Answers
Question:
Hi! I'm working with a multi-agency group on water quality improvement. We've got a "plan" that identifies key problems and lays out 13 broad goals to address the problems. In 2005 a coordinator was hired to coordinate the implementation of the plan. She took another position at the end of 2007 amid frustration. I have convinced the powers that be that we need to update the original plan so that we have clearer measures of success and a bonafide "coordination strategy". However, there's a push to hire a new coordinator as soon as possible. Here's my big question: would it be better to wait to hire a coordinator until after the plan is revised so we know what we need this person to coordinate or, to go ahead and hire a coordinator so s/he can be involved with revising the plan?
Answer:
When to revise a strategic plan is always a difficult judgement call. As often happens, there are competing priorities--all of which are quite important. One thing to consider is strength of leadership in the new coordinator. If you are recruiting a new coordinator that can develop the new plan, then you should hire the coordinator first. If however, you don't think a new coordinator would be capable of doing this themselves, then you might want to get the plan done first. It sounds like what you should really do is to hire a local consultant to help sort through this complicated situation. Ask around among other agencies about who they use, and see what advice they might offer. Thanks for submitting such an important question to us. We wish you the best in your effort.
Question Date:
Mon, 06/25/2007