Table of Contents >
Part J. Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives
Chapter 36. Introduction to Evaluation >
Section 5. Developing an Evaluation Plan >
Examples - Real world situational examples. >
Developing an Evaluation Plan | |
|---|---|
Examples |
Contributed by Chris Hampton Edited by Vincent T. Francisco and Bill Berkowitz |
Example 1: Table of Program Components and Elements
Here are a few of the items from the table of program components and elements for a fictional teen pregnancy prevention program:
|
Risk/ Protective Factors |
Program Components (Strategies) |
Program Elements (Tactics) |
Targets and Agents of Change |
Mode/Context of Delivery |
|
Risk factor: Unsupervised activities by teens |
Provide alternative activities |
|
Targets: Agents: |
|
|
Risk factor: Lack of access to contraceptives |
Increased access top health services |
|
Targets: Agents: |
|
|
Protective factor: Involvement in the faith community |
Encourage youth involvement in the faith community |
|
Targets: Agents: |
|
(Thanks to Adrienne Paine-Andrews of the Work Group on Health Promotion and Community Development for her assistance with the above table).
Example 2: Evaluation Questions and Methods
Here is a sample table of some of the questions from the evaluation plan of Youth Enrichment Services (Y.E.S.), an organization that provides urban young people with services that encourage them to explore, challenge themselves physically and mentally , and interact with positive role models:
|
Type of Data Collection* |
Experimental Design** | ||||||||
|
Key Evaluation Question(s) |
Type of Management Information and Evaluation Measure(s) |
Survey/ |
Structured Interview |
Self Report/ Log |
Direct Observation |
Archival Records |
Case Study |
Pre-Posttest Control Group |
Time Series |
|
A.Planning and Implementation Issues |
A. Descriptive and Process Measures |
||||||||
|
1.Who participates? Is there diversity among the participants? |
1.Basic demographic data (e.g., age, gender, disability, race, economic status , etc.) on participants. |
X |
X |
X |
|||||
|
2.Why do participants enter and leave the program? |
2.Information on participants? reasons for entering and leaving the program. |
X |
X |
X |
|||||
|
3.Are there a variety of service and alternative activities generated? |
3.Frequency of different types of service provided and alternative activities generated. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||
|
B.Assessing Attainment of Objectives |
B. Outcome Measures |
||||||||
|
1.How many people participate? |
1.Number of people participating. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X | |||
|
2.How many hours are participants involved in service and alternative activities? |
2.Number of hours of participation by type of activity |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X | |||
|
3.How many people are trained in cultural awareness and sensitivity? |
3.Number of people trained in cultural awareness and sensitivity. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X | |||
|
C.Impact on Participants |
|||||||||
|
1.How do behavior and attitudes change as a result of participation in the program ? |
1.Changes in programs, policies, and practices of affiliated organizations, and other outcomes. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X | |
|
2.Does participation affect the incidence of problems in living? |
2.Incidence of problems in living (e.g., substance use, gang involvement) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||
|
3.Are participants satisfied with the experience? |
3.Satisfaction ratings from participants. |
X |
X |
||||||
|
D.Impact on Community |
|||||||||
|
1.What resulted from the program? |
1.Changes in programs, policies, and practices of affiliated organizations, and other outcomes. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X | ||
|
2.Do the benefits of the program outweigh the costs? |
2.Cost benefit data. |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||
|
3.Are community members satisfied with the participants and the service they provide ? |
3.Satisfaction ratings from beneficiaries and community members. |
X |
X |
||||||
*Please note that the categories of types of data collection use broader terms than we've used to describe evaluation methods; here are some examples of methods that fall under these categories:
- Survey/Scale: i.e., member survey of satisfaction with goals, member survey of satisfaction with process, member survey of satisfaction with outcomes, and behavioral surveys
- Structured Interview: i.e., interview with key participants
- Staff Report/Log: i.e. monitoring system, goal attainment report
- Direct Observation: This refers to the direct observation of behavior by researchers .
- Archival Records: i.e., community-level indicators of impact
**Here are explanations of these terms:
- Case Study: an in-depth, start-to-finish analysis of a person, group, or community that focuses on developmental factors in relation to environment--good for answering "how" or "why" questions
- Pre-/Posttest Control Group: monitoring a group of people who fit into your group's target population who you don't expose to your initiative, so that you can compare them with the people who were part of the initiative, helping you get a better idea of how much real impact you've made
- Time Series: effects are measured from a long series of repeated measurements taken both before and after an initiative
Example 3: Timeline for Evaluation Activities
This is the timeline for an evaluation being done by Kansas City's Promise on their initiative to promote community and personal caring for youth:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Work Group for Community Health and Development
at the University of Kansas.Copyright © 2007 by the University of Kansas for all materials provided via the World Wide Web in the ctb.ku.edu domain.
